<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1947 (7) TMI 13 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296117</link>
    <description>The Division Bench resolved a conflict between judges&#039; decisions on the enforceability of a suit by an unregistered partnership under Section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act. The court, concurring with Sir John Beaumont, C.J., allowed the appeal, set aside the suit&#039;s dismissal, and remanded it for further trial on all issues except the one subject to the appeal. The appellant was awarded costs, and the court-fee paid on the appeal was to be refunded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 1947 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 09:52:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1947 (7) TMI 13 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296117</link>
      <description>The Division Bench resolved a conflict between judges&#039; decisions on the enforceability of a suit by an unregistered partnership under Section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act. The court, concurring with Sir John Beaumont, C.J., allowed the appeal, set aside the suit&#039;s dismissal, and remanded it for further trial on all issues except the one subject to the appeal. The appellant was awarded costs, and the court-fee paid on the appeal was to be refunded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 1947 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>