<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 872 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296116</link>
    <description>The court held that Section 69(2) of the Partnership Act does not bar an unregistered firm from filing a suit to enforce statutory or common law rights, such as in a passing-off action. The court clarified that the section applies only to contracts entered into by the firm with the defendant during business transactions. As the suit in question was based on infringement of statutory rights under the Trade Marks Act and common law principles, it was not barred by Section 69(2). The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2022 10:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 872 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296116</link>
      <description>The court held that Section 69(2) of the Partnership Act does not bar an unregistered firm from filing a suit to enforce statutory or common law rights, such as in a passing-off action. The court clarified that the section applies only to contracts entered into by the firm with the defendant during business transactions. As the suit in question was based on infringement of statutory rights under the Trade Marks Act and common law principles, it was not barred by Section 69(2). The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>