<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 168 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409326</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the constitutional validity and authority of SEBI to regulate fees charged by Investment Advisors under Regulation 3(XII) of the SEBI (Investment Advisors) (Amendment) Regulations, 2020. The Petitioner&#039;s argument that these regulations breached their fundamental right to practice their profession was dismissed. The Court found SEBI&#039;s regulatory powers encompass the imposition of fee structures and ceilings, emphasizing that such measures are necessary for investor protection and market regulation. The challenge against the regulations was deemed lacking in merit, and the Petition was ultimately dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2021 11:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 168 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409326</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the constitutional validity and authority of SEBI to regulate fees charged by Investment Advisors under Regulation 3(XII) of the SEBI (Investment Advisors) (Amendment) Regulations, 2020. The Petitioner&#039;s argument that these regulations breached their fundamental right to practice their profession was dismissed. The Court found SEBI&#039;s regulatory powers encompass the imposition of fee structures and ceilings, emphasizing that such measures are necessary for investor protection and market regulation. The challenge against the regulations was deemed lacking in merit, and the Petition was ultimately dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>