<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (3) TMI 94 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25875</link>
    <description>The court directed the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to reconsider the appeal, emphasizing the importance of considering the Explanation to section 271(1)(c) and evaluating the evidence to determine if the assessee had proven no fraud or neglect led to the incorrect return. The judgment returned the question unanswered and instructed a fresh decision by the Tribunal without any costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:03:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (3) TMI 94 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25875</link>
      <description>The court directed the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to reconsider the appeal, emphasizing the importance of considering the Explanation to section 271(1)(c) and evaluating the evidence to determine if the assessee had proven no fraud or neglect led to the incorrect return. The judgment returned the question unanswered and instructed a fresh decision by the Tribunal without any costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>