<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 160 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409318</link>
    <description>A revised refund claim for tax paid on specified export-related services was held not to be barred by limitation under paragraph 3(g) of Notification No. 41/2012-ST. The Tribunal applied its earlier view that a limitation condition in subordinate legislation cannot be used to defeat a substantive rebate or refund benefit where the parent enactment does not clearly authorise such a restriction. On that basis, rejection of the refund as time-barred was held unsustainable and the claim was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 08:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 160 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409318</link>
      <description>A revised refund claim for tax paid on specified export-related services was held not to be barred by limitation under paragraph 3(g) of Notification No. 41/2012-ST. The Tribunal applied its earlier view that a limitation condition in subordinate legislation cannot be used to defeat a substantive rebate or refund benefit where the parent enactment does not clearly authorise such a restriction. On that basis, rejection of the refund as time-barred was held unsustainable and the claim was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>