<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 129 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409287</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the ITAT Jaipur, with the Tribunal directing the deletion of additions related to the rejection of books of accounts and disallowance of expenses. The Tribunal found the declared GP rate of 1.52% justifiable, leading to the deletion of an addition of Rs. 3,14,300. The disallowance of expenses amounting to Rs. 2,23,840 was also deemed unjustified and directed to be deleted. The Tribunal did not provide detailed analysis on the issue of charging interest under sections 234B, 234C, and 234D.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 08:25:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 129 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409287</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the ITAT Jaipur, with the Tribunal directing the deletion of additions related to the rejection of books of accounts and disallowance of expenses. The Tribunal found the declared GP rate of 1.52% justifiable, leading to the deletion of an addition of Rs. 3,14,300. The disallowance of expenses amounting to Rs. 2,23,840 was also deemed unjustified and directed to be deleted. The Tribunal did not provide detailed analysis on the issue of charging interest under sections 234B, 234C, and 234D.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>