<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Misinterpretation of Notification No. 27/2012 Leads to Dispute Over CENVAT Credit Refund and Show Cause Notice Validity.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58624</link>
    <description>Refund of unutilized cenvat credit - validity of SCN - As per the Notification No.27/2012, there is no requirement to debit in the service return, the only requirement under Condition 2(h) of Notification No.27/2012 dt. 18/06/2012 is that the amount i.e. claimed as refund under Rule 5 of the said Rules shall be debited by claimant from his cenvat credit account at the time of making the claim and this condition has been followed by the appellant before filing the claim of refund but the impugned order has misconstrued and misinterpreted the requirement of Notification No.27/2012 - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 17:12:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 17:12:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Misinterpretation of Notification No. 27/2012 Leads to Dispute Over CENVAT Credit Refund and Show Cause Notice Validity.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58624</link>
      <description>Refund of unutilized cenvat credit - validity of SCN - As per the Notification No.27/2012, there is no requirement to debit in the service return, the only requirement under Condition 2(h) of Notification No.27/2012 dt. 18/06/2012 is that the amount i.e. claimed as refund under Rule 5 of the said Rules shall be debited by claimant from his cenvat credit account at the time of making the claim and this condition has been followed by the appellant before filing the claim of refund but the impugned order has misconstrued and misinterpreted the requirement of Notification No.27/2012 - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 17:12:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>