<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 120 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409278</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras disposed of a case involving a petition to quash an electronic mail notice of demand. The court encouraged the parties to negotiate and reconcile the interest amount to be paid. The respondent specified the interest demand for a particular period, prompting the petitioner to respond. Ultimately, the court declined to interfere and dismissed the writ petition without imposing any costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 08:57:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 120 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409278</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras disposed of a case involving a petition to quash an electronic mail notice of demand. The court encouraged the parties to negotiate and reconcile the interest amount to be paid. The respondent specified the interest demand for a particular period, prompting the petitioner to respond. Ultimately, the court declined to interfere and dismissed the writ petition without imposing any costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>