https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409276 The court found that the Assessing Officer (AO) did not properly address the objections raised by the assessee regarding the legality and jurisdiction of the impugned notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court set aside the orders disposing of the objections and remitted the matters to the AO to reconsider the objections and pass a fresh speaking order within eight weeks. If the fresh order is adverse to the assessee, the assessee should be given at least four weeks to challenge the order before the appropriate forum. en-us Fri, 11 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Jan 2023 10:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409276 The court found that the Assessing Officer (AO) did not properly address the objections raised by the assessee regarding the legality and jurisdiction of the impugned notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court set aside the orders disposing of the objections and remitted the matters to the AO to reconsider the objections and pass a fresh speaking order within eight weeks. If the fresh order is adverse to the assessee, the assessee should be given at least four weeks to challenge the order before the appropriate forum. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 11 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409276