<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 114 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409272</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal after analyzing issues related to the interpretation of deduction for expenses, the applicability of Section 115JB, and the acceptance of an additional ground on Section 115JB. The Court referred to previous judgments where substantial questions of law had been addressed, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 08:57:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 114 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409272</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal after analyzing issues related to the interpretation of deduction for expenses, the applicability of Section 115JB, and the acceptance of an additional ground on Section 115JB. The Court referred to previous judgments where substantial questions of law had been addressed, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>