<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 100 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409258</link>
    <description>Mere cutting of imported billets into smaller pieces for local sale does not amount to manufacture or processing when the goods retain their identity and character and no new product emerges. On that basis, the refund under Notification No. 102/2007-C could not be denied for alleged manufacture or processing. The contrary Revenue decisions were treated as distinguishable on facts, and the refund rejection was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 17:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 100 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409258</link>
      <description>Mere cutting of imported billets into smaller pieces for local sale does not amount to manufacture or processing when the goods retain their identity and character and no new product emerges. On that basis, the refund under Notification No. 102/2007-C could not be denied for alleged manufacture or processing. The contrary Revenue decisions were treated as distinguishable on facts, and the refund rejection was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>