<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 98 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409256</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the refund claim rejection. The appellant, a 100% EOU, successfully exported goods from stock at debonding, supported by complete document submission and legal precedents. The Tribunal found procedural violations unfounded and ordered the Adjudicating Authority to refund the duty amount with interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 08:56:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 98 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409256</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the refund claim rejection. The appellant, a 100% EOU, successfully exported goods from stock at debonding, supported by complete document submission and legal precedents. The Tribunal found procedural violations unfounded and ordered the Adjudicating Authority to refund the duty amount with interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>