<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 81 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409239</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the additions made under Section 2(22)(e) and Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act. It held that the transactions were genuine business dealings conducted in the ordinary course of business, and the deeming provisions and disallowances were deemed inapplicable based on the specific circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 08:55:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 81 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409239</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the additions made under Section 2(22)(e) and Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act. It held that the transactions were genuine business dealings conducted in the ordinary course of business, and the deeming provisions and disallowances were deemed inapplicable based on the specific circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>