<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1957 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296086</link>
    <description>A title suit based on a disputed power of attorney and a gift deed executed on its strength failed because the documents were found unreliable. The power of attorney showed material irregularities in signatures, dates, pagination and property description, and the attestation did not match the claimed execution dates; the alleged transfer by foreign citizens also lacked shown compliance with the governing law and prior Reserve Bank permission. The Court reiterated that a plaintiff seeking declaration of title and recovery of possession must prove title on the strength of her own evidence, and cannot rely on weaknesses in the defence. The concurrent decrees were set aside and the suit dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 08:55:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1957 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296086</link>
      <description>A title suit based on a disputed power of attorney and a gift deed executed on its strength failed because the documents were found unreliable. The power of attorney showed material irregularities in signatures, dates, pagination and property description, and the attestation did not match the claimed execution dates; the alleged transfer by foreign citizens also lacked shown compliance with the governing law and prior Reserve Bank permission. The Court reiterated that a plaintiff seeking declaration of title and recovery of possession must prove title on the strength of her own evidence, and cannot rely on weaknesses in the defence. The concurrent decrees were set aside and the suit dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>