<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1633 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296081</link>
    <description>The appeal against the order in original passed by the Pr. Commissioner, Customs, Central Excise &amp;amp; Service tax, Bhopal regarding clandestine removal of goods attracting Central Excise duty was dismissed. The impugned order setting aside the duty demand was upheld due to insufficient evidence supporting the Department&#039;s claim of clandestine removal by the respondent engaged in cigarette manufacturing. The appellant&#039;s arguments failed to establish merit, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 08:55:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1633 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296081</link>
      <description>The appeal against the order in original passed by the Pr. Commissioner, Customs, Central Excise &amp;amp; Service tax, Bhopal regarding clandestine removal of goods attracting Central Excise duty was dismissed. The impugned order setting aside the duty demand was upheld due to insufficient evidence supporting the Department&#039;s claim of clandestine removal by the respondent engaged in cigarette manufacturing. The appellant&#039;s arguments failed to establish merit, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>