<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1403 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296080</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for both A.Y. 1995-96 and A.Y. 2008-09. For A.Y. 1995-96, the issue was remanded to the AO for fresh adjudication, while for A.Y. 2008-09, the Tribunal upheld the principle of mutuality, exempting the TDR premium from tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 08:55:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1403 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296080</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for both A.Y. 1995-96 and A.Y. 2008-09. For A.Y. 1995-96, the issue was remanded to the AO for fresh adjudication, while for A.Y. 2008-09, the Tribunal upheld the principle of mutuality, exempting the TDR premium from tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>