<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1242 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296092</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment order for the A.Y. 2011-12 due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to dispose of the preliminary objections raised by the assessee before completing the assessment. This procedural lapse rendered the reassessment order invalid. Consequently, the Tribunal did not examine the other grounds and contentions raised by the assessee on merits, as addressing them would be merely academic. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 08:55:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1242 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296092</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment order for the A.Y. 2011-12 due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to dispose of the preliminary objections raised by the assessee before completing the assessment. This procedural lapse rendered the reassessment order invalid. Consequently, the Tribunal did not examine the other grounds and contentions raised by the assessee on merits, as addressing them would be merely academic. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>