https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296073 A foreign national could not continue as trustee or administer immovable property in India without the permission required by law, and the settlement deed also required personal participation in the charities, regular collection and distribution of income, and proper accounts. Because the plaintiff had become a British citizen, lived in London, lacked permission to hold immovable property in India, and did not perform the duties required by the deed, he was not entitled to trusteeship or possession of the house property. The second defendant, being the next male heir in India and capable of managing the properties, was found fit to act as trustee and maintain the properties. en-us Mon, 30 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Jul 2021 17:25:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296073 A foreign national could not continue as trustee or administer immovable property in India without the permission required by law, and the settlement deed also required personal participation in the charities, regular collection and distribution of income, and proper accounts. Because the plaintiff had become a British citizen, lived in London, lacked permission to hold immovable property in India, and did not perform the duties required by the deed, he was not entitled to trusteeship or possession of the house property. The second defendant, being the next male heir in India and capable of managing the properties, was found fit to act as trustee and maintain the properties. Case-Laws FEMA Mon, 30 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296073