https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296068 A suit for specific performance was treated as maintainable after amendment of the plaint, and the plaintiff's continuous readiness and willingness were accepted because notices, telegrams and proof of funds showed performance was pursued. The alleged need for Land and Development Office permission, and any issue under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, did not operate as a bar to the decree, as such questions were not conditions precedent and could arise, if at all, at execution. Section 31 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 did not render the agreement to sell void merely because one vendor was a foreign citizen, since a contract for sale does not itself transfer an interest in land. en-us Fri, 26 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Jul 2021 16:36:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296068 A suit for specific performance was treated as maintainable after amendment of the plaint, and the plaintiff's continuous readiness and willingness were accepted because notices, telegrams and proof of funds showed performance was pursued. The alleged need for Land and Development Office permission, and any issue under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, did not operate as a bar to the decree, as such questions were not conditions precedent and could arise, if at all, at execution. Section 31 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 did not render the agreement to sell void merely because one vendor was a foreign citizen, since a contract for sale does not itself transfer an interest in land. Case-Laws FEMA Fri, 26 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296068