<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 641 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296063</link>
    <description>The appeal against acquittal in a case involving the validity of a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was dismissed. The court held that presenting a time-barred cheque for encashment after a significant period could lead to anomalous situations and should not be allowed. The judgment&#039;s scope was limited to the specific case, ensuring it did not affect any civil actions the appellant may pursue separately against the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 09:56:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 641 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296063</link>
      <description>The appeal against acquittal in a case involving the validity of a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was dismissed. The court held that presenting a time-barred cheque for encashment after a significant period could lead to anomalous situations and should not be allowed. The judgment&#039;s scope was limited to the specific case, ensuring it did not affect any civil actions the appellant may pursue separately against the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>