<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 59 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409217</link>
    <description>Proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code are subject to the Limitation Act through Section 238A, and a written acknowledgment of a subsisting liability signed before expiry of limitation can trigger a fresh limitation period under Section 18. On the stated facts, the corporate debtor issued a written acknowledgment of liability on 10.07.2018, and the limitation objection had already been raised and considered before the Adjudicating Authority. The application under Section 7 could therefore not be treated as time barred merely by reference to the original date of default or NPA, and the limitation objection failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 08:59:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 59 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409217</link>
      <description>Proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code are subject to the Limitation Act through Section 238A, and a written acknowledgment of a subsisting liability signed before expiry of limitation can trigger a fresh limitation period under Section 18. On the stated facts, the corporate debtor issued a written acknowledgment of liability on 10.07.2018, and the limitation objection had already been raised and considered before the Adjudicating Authority. The application under Section 7 could therefore not be treated as time barred merely by reference to the original date of default or NPA, and the limitation objection failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>