<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1537 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296050</link>
    <description>Writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to challenge the detention order after its execution. The respondents were permitted to take all steps in law to execute the detention order under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974, leaving the legality of the detention order open for challenge at the appropriate stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 08:56:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1537 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296050</link>
      <description>Writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to challenge the detention order after its execution. The respondents were permitted to take all steps in law to execute the detention order under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974, leaving the legality of the detention order open for challenge at the appropriate stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>