<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1722 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296055</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to a bank&#039;s classification of an account as a wilful defaulter was not finally decided on merits; the court left that challenge open for consideration in proceedings conducted under the Master Circular. The bank was permitted to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law, so the classification issue could be examined within the prescribed framework rather than being conclusively interfered with in writ jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 08:56:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1722 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296055</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to a bank&#039;s classification of an account as a wilful defaulter was not finally decided on merits; the court left that challenge open for consideration in proceedings conducted under the Master Circular. The bank was permitted to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law, so the classification issue could be examined within the prescribed framework rather than being conclusively interfered with in writ jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>