<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1632 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296058</link>
    <description>In a customs appeal, the Supreme Court noted that, having regard to the facts and circumstances and particularly the period that had elapsed after the impugned order, no further order was necessary. The appeal was dismissed accordingly. The order reflects a disposal based on the practical effect of the lapse of time rather than any further substantive direction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 08:56:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1632 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296058</link>
      <description>In a customs appeal, the Supreme Court noted that, having regard to the facts and circumstances and particularly the period that had elapsed after the impugned order, no further order was necessary. The appeal was dismissed accordingly. The order reflects a disposal based on the practical effect of the lapse of time rather than any further substantive direction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>