https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296033 Preventive detention requires strict compliance with constitutional safeguards, and a fresh detention order is vitiated if the detaining authority relies on an earlier order that has already been quashed, because such reliance introduces extraneous and irrelevant material into the subjective satisfaction process. The reference to the struck-down order was treated as a real basis for detention, so the defect was not cured by severability. The detention order was therefore held illegal and could not stand, though the authority was left free to consider passing a fresh detention order on the same facts if so advised. en-us Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Jul 2021 11:52:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296033 Preventive detention requires strict compliance with constitutional safeguards, and a fresh detention order is vitiated if the detaining authority relies on an earlier order that has already been quashed, because such reliance introduces extraneous and irrelevant material into the subjective satisfaction process. The reference to the struck-down order was treated as a real basis for detention, so the defect was not cured by severability. The detention order was therefore held illegal and could not stand, though the authority was left free to consider passing a fresh detention order on the same facts if so advised. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296033