<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 30 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409188</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the impugned order due to delay in filing the appeal and condoned the delay, imposing a cost of Rs. 10,000. Emphasizing that litigants should not suffer due to counsel&#039;s fault, the Court remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision on the appeal without being influenced by the High Court&#039;s observations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 07:56:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 30 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409188</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the impugned order due to delay in filing the appeal and condoned the delay, imposing a cost of Rs. 10,000. Emphasizing that litigants should not suffer due to counsel&#039;s fault, the Court remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision on the appeal without being influenced by the High Court&#039;s observations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>