<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 19 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409177</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to allow exemption u/s 11 of the Income Tax Act for the relevant assessment years, rejecting the Department&#039;s appeal. It found the activities of the assessee, a Development Authority, to be charitable and in line with the definition of charitable purpose u/s 2(15). The Tribunal emphasized the lack of new evidence to challenge previous findings and dismissed the revenue&#039;s arguments, affirming the benefit of exemption u/s 11.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 17:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 19 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409177</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to allow exemption u/s 11 of the Income Tax Act for the relevant assessment years, rejecting the Department&#039;s appeal. It found the activities of the assessee, a Development Authority, to be charitable and in line with the definition of charitable purpose u/s 2(15). The Tribunal emphasized the lack of new evidence to challenge previous findings and dismissed the revenue&#039;s arguments, affirming the benefit of exemption u/s 11.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>