<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (3) TMI 74 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296013</link>
    <description>Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act protects a transferee in possession against the transferor and, in a proper case, against a reversioner claiming under a Hindu widow where her transaction would bind the estate. The protection depends on strict proof of a written contract with ascertainable terms, credible evidence of the document&#039;s loss if secondary evidence is relied on, and proof that possession was delivered in part performance. On the facts discussed, inconsistent testimony and failure to prove the contract, loss of the original, and delivery of possession meant the statutory defence could not be invoked.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:19:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (3) TMI 74 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296013</link>
      <description>Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act protects a transferee in possession against the transferor and, in a proper case, against a reversioner claiming under a Hindu widow where her transaction would bind the estate. The protection depends on strict proof of a written contract with ascertainable terms, credible evidence of the document&#039;s loss if secondary evidence is relied on, and proof that possession was delivered in part performance. On the facts discussed, inconsistent testimony and failure to prove the contract, loss of the original, and delivery of possession meant the statutory defence could not be invoked.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>