https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409156 The petitioner claimed Input Tax Credit but faced discrepancies in GST filings by the seller. The petitioner argued for recovery from the seller based on a GST Council Press Release and a Madras High Court judgment. The court admitted the petition for hearing, directing the respondents to reply within four weeks. The petitioner was instructed to deposit 5% of the demanded amount within 15 days to avoid coercive measures. The case was scheduled for listing in August 2021. en-us Thu, 24 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Mar 2025 13:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409156 The petitioner claimed Input Tax Credit but faced discrepancies in GST filings by the seller. The petitioner argued for recovery from the seller based on a GST Council Press Release and a Madras High Court judgment. The court admitted the petition for hearing, directing the respondents to reply within four weeks. The petitioner was instructed to deposit 5% of the demanded amount within 15 days to avoid coercive measures. The case was scheduled for listing in August 2021. Case-Laws GST Thu, 24 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409156