https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409154 Writ jurisdiction was declined against assessment orders because an efficacious statutory appeal was available. The Court noted that the earlier orders setting aside distraint attachment were limited to the absence of opportunity before attachment and did not absolve the assessee from tax liability or prevent the revenue from proceeding with assessment after fresh notice. As the impugned orders were appealable, the Court refused to examine the merits in writ proceedings and left the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy. en-us Wed, 23 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:23:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409154 Writ jurisdiction was declined against assessment orders because an efficacious statutory appeal was available. The Court noted that the earlier orders setting aside distraint attachment were limited to the absence of opportunity before attachment and did not absolve the assessee from tax liability or prevent the revenue from proceeding with assessment after fresh notice. As the impugned orders were appealable, the Court refused to examine the merits in writ proceedings and left the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 23 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409154