https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409153 The Court allowed the writ petition challenging the legality of the oral examination for the 'G' Card license issuance. It held that the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations 2018 prescribed only a written examination, not an oral one. The Court emphasized that oral examinations could introduce bias and should not be part of the licensing process. Consequently, the Court struck down the oral examination requirement and the Public Notice mandating both written and oral exams. The petitioner was directed to be appointed as a 'G' card license holder within four weeks based on passing the written examination, resolving the dispute without costs. en-us Wed, 23 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409153 The Court allowed the writ petition challenging the legality of the oral examination for the 'G' Card license issuance. It held that the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations 2018 prescribed only a written examination, not an oral one. The Court emphasized that oral examinations could introduce bias and should not be part of the licensing process. Consequently, the Court struck down the oral examination requirement and the Public Notice mandating both written and oral exams. The petitioner was directed to be appointed as a 'G' card license holder within four weeks based on passing the written examination, resolving the dispute without costs. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 23 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409153