https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409142 The High Court addressed issues regarding the maintainability of the appeal under Section 35G, jurisdiction based on appeal value, the impact of the M/s Unicorn Industries case judgment, and a request for rectification before the CESTAT. The Court found the appeal not maintainable before the High Court due to the appeal value falling below the threshold set by the National Litigation Policy. It granted the Appellant liberty to seek rectification before the CESTAT in light of the modified judgment, emphasizing the importance of addressing legal changes through proper legal avenues. en-us Mon, 05 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409142 The High Court addressed issues regarding the maintainability of the appeal under Section 35G, jurisdiction based on appeal value, the impact of the M/s Unicorn Industries case judgment, and a request for rectification before the CESTAT. The Court found the appeal not maintainable before the High Court due to the appeal value falling below the threshold set by the National Litigation Policy. It granted the Appellant liberty to seek rectification before the CESTAT in light of the modified judgment, emphasizing the importance of addressing legal changes through proper legal avenues. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 05 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409142