<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 1037 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409141</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, condoning the delay in filing and remitting the penalty issue back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration post the determination of quantum additions. The decision emphasized a justice-oriented approach in interpreting &quot;sufficient cause&quot; for delay and recognized the interdependence of penalty quantification on finalized quantum additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:22:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 1037 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409141</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, condoning the delay in filing and remitting the penalty issue back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration post the determination of quantum additions. The decision emphasized a justice-oriented approach in interpreting &quot;sufficient cause&quot; for delay and recognized the interdependence of penalty quantification on finalized quantum additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>