<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 1016 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409120</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) did not have jurisdiction to invoke Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest. The Tribunal found the waiver of loan to be a capital receipt, following precedents, and set aside the CIT&#039;s order, reinstating the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 18.06.2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2021 18:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 1016 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409120</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) did not have jurisdiction to invoke Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest. The Tribunal found the waiver of loan to be a capital receipt, following precedents, and set aside the CIT&#039;s order, reinstating the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 18.06.2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>