https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296001 The Tribunal upheld the demand of service tax, interest, and penalties imposed on the appellant for providing services classified as "Security Agency Service" to Metro Railways. The penalties under sections 76 and 78 were confirmed, and the applicability of Section 11D was upheld despite the appellant's arguments. The Tribunal also determined that the proceedings were initiated within the limitation period, ultimately rejecting the appellant's appeal and sustaining the order. en-us Fri, 29 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:19:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296001 The Tribunal upheld the demand of service tax, interest, and penalties imposed on the appellant for providing services classified as "Security Agency Service" to Metro Railways. The penalties under sections 76 and 78 were confirmed, and the applicability of Section 11D was upheld despite the appellant's arguments. The Tribunal also determined that the proceedings were initiated within the limitation period, ultimately rejecting the appellant's appeal and sustaining the order. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 29 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296001