https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296006 A defamation complaint under Section 200 CrPC filed through an expressly authorised power of attorney holder was maintainable because Section 199(1) CrPC permits a complaint by the person aggrieved and does not prevent presentation through an authorised representative. The objection that the holder lacked personal knowledge was not accepted as a ground to quash the proceedings at the threshold, because issues of proof and evidence could be examined later by the trial court. The order taking cognizance and issuing summons for offences under Sections 500, 501 and 502 IPC was therefore not interfered with. en-us Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:19:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296006 A defamation complaint under Section 200 CrPC filed through an expressly authorised power of attorney holder was maintainable because Section 199(1) CrPC permits a complaint by the person aggrieved and does not prevent presentation through an authorised representative. The objection that the holder lacked personal knowledge was not accepted as a ground to quash the proceedings at the threshold, because issues of proof and evidence could be examined later by the trial court. The order taking cognizance and issuing summons for offences under Sections 500, 501 and 502 IPC was therefore not interfered with. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296006