<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 999 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295994</link>
    <description>A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act may be presented through an authorised power of attorney holder, because presentation by a representative does not by itself invalidate a complaint based on documentary material. However, continuation of the prosecution through such a representative requires prior permission of the court where the procedural law so mandates. Here, process had been issued without obtaining that permission, so the order issuing process was set aside and the proceedings were quashed, while the permissibility of presenting the complaint through the power of attorney holder was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2021 15:27:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 999 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295994</link>
      <description>A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act may be presented through an authorised power of attorney holder, because presentation by a representative does not by itself invalidate a complaint based on documentary material. However, continuation of the prosecution through such a representative requires prior permission of the court where the procedural law so mandates. Here, process had been issued without obtaining that permission, so the order issuing process was set aside and the proceedings were quashed, while the permissibility of presenting the complaint through the power of attorney holder was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>