<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1242 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295993</link>
    <description>A conviction for murder and disappearance of evidence was sustained on circumstantial evidence where the proved circumstances formed a complete chain pointing only to the accused. The Court accepted the deceased&#039;s presence at the accused&#039;s house, the accused&#039;s misleading conduct toward the family, the demand and receipt of money, the fabricated letter, and the recovery of the body from near the house on information supplied by the accused. Delay in lodging the FIR was explained by the accused&#039;s false assurances, and the decomposed body accounted for the absence of a specific medical opinion on cause of death. Objections to the confession and recovery did not displace the prosecution case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2021 14:25:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1242 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295993</link>
      <description>A conviction for murder and disappearance of evidence was sustained on circumstantial evidence where the proved circumstances formed a complete chain pointing only to the accused. The Court accepted the deceased&#039;s presence at the accused&#039;s house, the accused&#039;s misleading conduct toward the family, the demand and receipt of money, the fabricated letter, and the recovery of the body from near the house on information supplied by the accused. Delay in lodging the FIR was explained by the accused&#039;s false assurances, and the decomposed body accounted for the absence of a specific medical opinion on cause of death. Objections to the confession and recovery did not displace the prosecution case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>