https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295992 The Court applied a liberal approach to delay condonation, holding that substantial justice should prevail where the challenge had been pursued through review and writ proceedings, and the matter was not rejected on limitation. It then held that a dispute under section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act was not maintainable against the petitioner because the pleadings contained no foundational averment connecting him with the society, and evidence could not cure that defect. On the same basis, the award and appellate order could not be sustained against him and were set aside, with the writ petition succeeding insofar as it affected the petitioner. en-us Tue, 02 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Jun 2021 14:08:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295992 The Court applied a liberal approach to delay condonation, holding that substantial justice should prevail where the challenge had been pursued through review and writ proceedings, and the matter was not rejected on limitation. It then held that a dispute under section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act was not maintainable against the petitioner because the pleadings contained no foundational averment connecting him with the society, and evidence could not cure that defect. On the same basis, the award and appellate order could not be sustained against him and were set aside, with the writ petition succeeding insofar as it affected the petitioner. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295992