<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Shocking reality - NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE (NFAC ) SEEMS NOT PREPARED AND EQUIPPED TO HANDLE PENALTY MATTERS or NFAC is also adopting easy going approach and harassing assessee.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9875</link>
    <description>The National Faceless Assessment Centre is criticised for lacking access to assessment and departmental records, repeatedly requesting assessees to furnish basic documents (assessment orders, appeal filings and orders, prior replies, evidence against penalty, and scheme election proof) that are available in the taxpayer&#039;s online account. This practice imposes duplicative burdens, suggests operational unpreparedness of faceless penalty proceedings, and is compounded by short compliance timelines; the author urges improved portal functionality, proactive retrieval of departmental records, and reconsideration of trivial penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2021 10:02:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2021 10:02:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Shocking reality - NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE (NFAC ) SEEMS NOT PREPARED AND EQUIPPED TO HANDLE PENALTY MATTERS or NFAC is also adopting easy going approach and harassing assessee.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9875</link>
      <description>The National Faceless Assessment Centre is criticised for lacking access to assessment and departmental records, repeatedly requesting assessees to furnish basic documents (assessment orders, appeal filings and orders, prior replies, evidence against penalty, and scheme election proof) that are available in the taxpayer&#039;s online account. This practice imposes duplicative burdens, suggests operational unpreparedness of faceless penalty proceedings, and is compounded by short compliance timelines; the author urges improved portal functionality, proactive retrieval of departmental records, and reconsideration of trivial penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2021 10:02:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>