<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 999 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409103</link>
    <description>Under section 73(4) of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003, an appellate authority may relax the usual tax-payment requirement for entertaining an appeal by waiving part of the amount, accepting a lesser pre-deposit, or taking security for recorded reasons. The Tribunal reduced the pre-deposit from 25% to 15% after considering the assessee&#039;s turnover and financial position. That interim exercise of statutory discretion was not shown to infringe any enforceable legal right, and interference in writ jurisdiction was therefore not warranted. In revenue recovery matters, Article 226 intervention is ordinarily limited absent jurisdictional error or breach of a legal right.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2021 10:00:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 999 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409103</link>
      <description>Under section 73(4) of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003, an appellate authority may relax the usual tax-payment requirement for entertaining an appeal by waiving part of the amount, accepting a lesser pre-deposit, or taking security for recorded reasons. The Tribunal reduced the pre-deposit from 25% to 15% after considering the assessee&#039;s turnover and financial position. That interim exercise of statutory discretion was not shown to infringe any enforceable legal right, and interference in writ jurisdiction was therefore not warranted. In revenue recovery matters, Article 226 intervention is ordinarily limited absent jurisdictional error or breach of a legal right.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>