https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409098 A cheque dishonour dispute turned on whether the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt and whether the statutory presumptions were rebutted. The complainant failed to prove any prior relationship or loan transaction and produced no independent evidence of liability. The accused promptly denied liability, consistently pleaded that the cheque had been given blank in connection with a vehicle transaction involving a third party related to the complainant, and relied on surrounding circumstances, including the civil court record and the admitted vehicle agreement. Those materials made the defence version probable and exposed inconsistencies in the complainant's case. Mere admission of signature on the cheque was not enough to establish liability. en-us Fri, 11 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Jun 2021 09:59:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409098 A cheque dishonour dispute turned on whether the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt and whether the statutory presumptions were rebutted. The complainant failed to prove any prior relationship or loan transaction and produced no independent evidence of liability. The accused promptly denied liability, consistently pleaded that the cheque had been given blank in connection with a vehicle transaction involving a third party related to the complainant, and relied on surrounding circumstances, including the civil court record and the admitted vehicle agreement. Those materials made the defence version probable and exposed inconsistencies in the complainant's case. Mere admission of signature on the cheque was not enough to establish liability. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409098