https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409093 The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, upholding the Adjudicating Authority's order. It found that the Adjudicating Authority had jurisdiction to decide the application involving CIRP or liquidation proceedings. GIACL had the standing to challenge DSKL's inclusion as a Prospective Resolution Applicant. DSKL was deemed unnecessary as a party to the application, and allowing it to file EOI after the deadline was considered a regulatory violation. Adverse remarks against Pankaj Joshi were upheld due to biased conduct. The decision highlighted the lack of merit in DSKL and Joshi's arguments, emphasizing Joshi's lack of good faith and bias influence. en-us Mon, 28 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Jun 2021 09:59:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409093 The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, upholding the Adjudicating Authority's order. It found that the Adjudicating Authority had jurisdiction to decide the application involving CIRP or liquidation proceedings. GIACL had the standing to challenge DSKL's inclusion as a Prospective Resolution Applicant. DSKL was deemed unnecessary as a party to the application, and allowing it to file EOI after the deadline was considered a regulatory violation. Adverse remarks against Pankaj Joshi were upheld due to biased conduct. The decision highlighted the lack of merit in DSKL and Joshi's arguments, emphasizing Joshi's lack of good faith and bias influence. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 28 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409093