<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 983 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409087</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal overturned the disallowance of a deduction claimed under section 54 of the Income Tax Act for the A.Y. 2014-15. The Tribunal found the Assessee&#039;s transaction genuine, allowing the deduction of the disputed amount of 27 lakhs. The decision underscored the importance of providing concrete evidence to support tax claims and highlighted the necessity of transparency and documentation in substantiating transactions and deductions under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2021 09:58:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 983 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409087</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal overturned the disallowance of a deduction claimed under section 54 of the Income Tax Act for the A.Y. 2014-15. The Tribunal found the Assessee&#039;s transaction genuine, allowing the deduction of the disputed amount of 27 lakhs. The decision underscored the importance of providing concrete evidence to support tax claims and highlighted the necessity of transparency and documentation in substantiating transactions and deductions under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>