<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 980 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409084</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the shortage of inventory, directing the A.O. to permit the entire deduction. The issue of exceptional items expenditure was remanded back to the A.O. for further examination. The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the franchisee fees, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2021 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 980 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409084</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the shortage of inventory, directing the A.O. to permit the entire deduction. The issue of exceptional items expenditure was remanded back to the A.O. for further examination. The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the franchisee fees, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>