<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 966 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409070</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the additions made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) were not justified. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) claims under Section 10(38) and delete the disallowance of brokerage expenses. The orders of the lower authorities were set aside in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2021 21:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 966 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409070</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the additions made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) were not justified. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) claims under Section 10(38) and delete the disallowance of brokerage expenses. The orders of the lower authorities were set aside in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>