<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1390 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295976</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation, allowing the set-off of Rs. 10,5717,523 from earlier years. The Tribunal also disallowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal concerning the disallowance of interest on loans to sister concerns, holding that the interest expenditure should not be disallowed due to the appellant&#039;s sufficient own funds. The judgment was pronounced on February 18, 2014, at Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2021 09:39:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1390 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295976</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation, allowing the set-off of Rs. 10,5717,523 from earlier years. The Tribunal also disallowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal concerning the disallowance of interest on loans to sister concerns, holding that the interest expenditure should not be disallowed due to the appellant&#039;s sufficient own funds. The judgment was pronounced on February 18, 2014, at Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>