<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1935 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295978</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict the addition of bogus purchases to 10% of the total amount for the assessment year 2009-2010. The ITAT emphasized the evidence presented and applied legal principles, citing relevant High Court judgments. The decision aligned with precedents from the Hon&#039;ble Bombay and Gujarat High Courts, stating that only the profit element from such purchases should be added to the assessee&#039;s income. As a result, the ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and instructed the AO to calculate the addition accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2021 09:39:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1935 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295978</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict the addition of bogus purchases to 10% of the total amount for the assessment year 2009-2010. The ITAT emphasized the evidence presented and applied legal principles, citing relevant High Court judgments. The decision aligned with precedents from the Hon&#039;ble Bombay and Gujarat High Courts, stating that only the profit element from such purchases should be added to the assessee&#039;s income. As a result, the ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and instructed the AO to calculate the addition accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>