<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 819 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295974</link>
    <description>The High Court reversed the 1st Additional Sessions Judge&#039;s decision to set aside the conviction and sentence of the Appellants under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. However, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashing the conviction and sentence. The Court considered the settlement between the parties and the provision for compounding the offence under section 147 of the Act, emphasizing justice and following a previous case precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 819 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295974</link>
      <description>The High Court reversed the 1st Additional Sessions Judge&#039;s decision to set aside the conviction and sentence of the Appellants under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. However, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashing the conviction and sentence. The Court considered the settlement between the parties and the provision for compounding the offence under section 147 of the Act, emphasizing justice and following a previous case precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>