<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 1095 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295968</link>
    <description>The Full Bench held that a payment by a dishonored cheque constitutes an acknowledgment of debt and liability, saving the limitation period under Section 18 of the Limitation Act. The matter was referred back to the single Judge for further proceedings based on this ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2021 14:06:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 1095 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295968</link>
      <description>The Full Bench held that a payment by a dishonored cheque constitutes an acknowledgment of debt and liability, saving the limitation period under Section 18 of the Limitation Act. The matter was referred back to the single Judge for further proceedings based on this ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>